Maklum Balas Penduduk Majoriti kpd Notis Pandangan Awam MBDK - Kami tetap membantah untuk mewujudkan sebarang bentuk skim GnG di sini

Notis Pandangan Awam - GnG tiada kelulusan MBDK

Maka dengan ini kami bagi pihak penduduk majoriti di sini MEMBANTAH dengan sekeras-kerasnya sebarang pelan untuk mewujudkan GnG, dan meminta supaya MBDK tidak memberi kelulusan kepada mana-mana pihak untuk melaksanakan sebarang skim di taman perumahan bukan swasta atau strata.

Pihak penduduk majoriti di sini juga ingin pihak MBDK mengambil tindakan serta membubarkan skim sediada yang tidak memperolehi kelulusan sekian lama.

Kepada semua penduduk komuniti di sini - pastikan anda membantah skim yang tidak sah, skim yang tidak mendapat kelulusan dan jangan terpedaya dengan skim yang hanya menguntungkan setengah pihak tetapi membebankan komuniti dan masyarakat.

Kepada penduduk yang inginkan fasiliti "Gated Community", sila pindah ke Eco Ardence (Gated Community yang sah) atau mana-mana skim berpagar lain yang sah.

Justeru itu tidak hairan mesyuarat agung yang telah diadakan baru-baru ini hanya mendapat sambutan minoriti sahaja sebab majoriti penduduk di sini sudah muak dan tidak lagi menyokong GnG tidak sah ini. 

Kalau ikhlas, bubar sahaja skim ini dan tubuhkan skim rondaan sukarela di bawah KRT (Rukun Tetangga).

Sekian

Hidup Rakyat
Silent Majority
Kita Jaga Kita

Rukun Tetangga vs GnG

As long as the authorities allow corrupt RAs to operate illegal GnG schemes in our non-strata neighbourhoods, Rukun Tetangga will never take off. Why? Because corrupt RAs won't be able to profit from operating Rukun Tetangga's Skim Rondaan Sukarela.

They are not interested in KRT because they won't be able to collect monthly fees from the residents. It is so easy to enrich themselves when they operate any informal GnG schemes - just hire one or two guards and start collecting monthly "security fees" from the residents. Then they install access cards system to make their operation easier. As simple as that.

It seems these amendments to the Rukun Tetangga bill does not prioritize Rukun Tetangga scheme over informal GnG schemes and thus makes little differences.

Perhaps the authorities should look into the applications of RAs who wished to set up new or to renew their GnG schemes - firstly they will have to show proof that they have briefed all the residents on the matter and the majority of them want to pay for an illegal GnG scheme rather than a free government's empowered Rukun Tetangga scheme.